This explainer presents both sides based on the measure's text. It does not recommend a vote.
Plain English Summary
Amendment D would have changed Utah's constitution to restrict certain foreign-born individuals from running for office and modified the process for citizen-initiated ballot measures. The amendment would have created new eligibility requirements for candidates and changed how initiatives move through the legislative process.
If YES
New restrictions would apply to foreign-born candidates seeking certain elected offices in Utah
confidence: high
The citizen initiative process would operate under modified rules and procedures
confidence: high
Additional eligibility requirements would be established for candidates running for office
confidence: medium
Changes to how ballot measures are processed and considered would take effect
confidence: medium
If NO
Current candidate eligibility requirements would remain unchanged
confidence: high
The existing citizen initiative process would continue operating under current rules
confidence: high
No new restrictions would be placed on foreign-born candidates
confidence: high
Utah's constitution would remain unchanged regarding these election processes
confidence: high
Financial impact
Fiscal impact analysis not yet available. Implementation costs would likely include administrative changes to election processes and candidate verification procedures.
TL;DR
Amendment D would have restricted foreign-born candidates from certain offices and changed the citizen initiative process, but it failed to pass.
Limitations
Based on measure title only — full text analysis may reveal additional details