This explainer presents both sides based on the measure's text. It does not recommend a vote.
Plain English Summary
This measure would change how Nevada conducts elections by implementing ranked-choice voting, where voters rank candidates in order of preference, and open primaries, where all candidates appear on one primary ballot regardless of party. This is a confirmation vote on a previously proposed change to the election system.
If YES
Nevada would adopt ranked-choice voting, allowing voters to rank candidates in order of preference rather than choosing just one
confidence: high
Primary elections would become open, with all candidates appearing on one ballot regardless of party affiliation
confidence: high
Winners would need broader support, as candidates must appeal to voters beyond their party base
confidence: medium
Election administration would need to be updated to handle the new voting and counting systems
confidence: high
If NO
Nevada would keep its current election system with traditional voting methods and party-based primaries
confidence: high
Voters would continue to select one candidate per race, with the candidate receiving the most votes winning
confidence: high
Primary elections would remain separate by party, with only registered party members typically voting in each party's primary
confidence: high
No changes would be needed to current election equipment or procedures
confidence: high
Financial impact
Fiscal impact analysis not yet available. Implementation would likely require costs for new voting equipment, election system updates, and voter education programs.
TL;DR
This measure would replace Nevada's current voting system with ranked-choice voting and open primaries.
Limitations
Based on measure title only — full text analysis may reveal additional details