This explainer presents both sides based on the measure's text. It does not recommend a vote.
Plain English Summary
Amendment J would remove language from Colorado's state constitution that currently defines marriage as only between one man and one woman. This constitutional language has been unenforceable since federal court rulings legalized same-sex marriage, but it would officially remove the outdated text from the state constitution.
If YES
The constitutional definition limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples would be permanently removed from Colorado's constitution
confidence: high
Colorado's constitution would no longer contain language that conflicts with current federal law on same-sex marriage
confidence: high
Same-sex marriage would continue to remain legal and recognized in Colorado as it currently is
confidence: high
The state constitution would be updated to reflect current marriage law and practice
confidence: high
If NO
The constitutional language defining marriage as between one man and one woman would remain in Colorado's constitution
confidence: high
Same-sex marriage would continue to remain legal and recognized in Colorado due to federal court rulings
confidence: high
Colorado's constitution would continue to contain language that conflicts with current federal marriage law
confidence: high
No changes would be made to existing marriage laws or procedures
confidence: high
Financial impact
Fiscal impact analysis not yet available. This appears to be primarily a constitutional text change that would not directly affect government spending or revenue.
TL;DR
Amendment J removes outdated constitutional language that defined marriage as only between one man and one woman, though same-sex marriage remains legal either way.
Limitations
Based on measure title only — full text analysis may reveal additional details